Dropped: Weak Conformance - More Details
To simplify the underlying type theory, Scala 3 drops the notion of weak conformance altogether. Instead, it provides more flexibility when assigning a type to a constant expression. The new rule is:
- 
     If a list of expressions Esappears as one of- the elements of a vararg parameter, or
- the alternatives of an if-then-else or match expression, or
- the body and catch results of a try expression,
 
- 
     and all expressions have primitive numeric types, but they do not all have the same type, 
- 
     then the following is attempted: - the expressions Esare partitioned intoIntconstants on the one hand, and all other expressions on the other hand,
- if all the other expressions have the same numeric type T(which can be one ofByte,Short,Char,Int,Long,Float,Double), possibly after widening, and if none of theIntliterals would incur a loss of precision when converted toT, then they are thus converted (the other expressions are left unchanged regardless),
- otherwise, the expressions Esare used unchanged.
 A loss of precision occurs for - an Int -> Floatconversion of a constantcifc.toFloat.toInt != c
- an Int -> Byteconversion of a constantcifc.toByte.toInt != c,
- an Int -> Shortconversion of a constantcifc.toShort.toInt != c.
 
- the expressions 
Examples
inline val b = 33
def f(): Int = b + 1
Array(b, 33, 5.5)      : Array[Double] // b is an inline val
Array(f(), 33, 5.5)    : Array[AnyVal] // f() is not a constant
Array(5, 11L)          : Array[Long]
Array(5, 11L, 5.5)     : Array[AnyVal] // Long and Double found
Array(1.0f, 2)         : Array[Float]
Array(1.0f, 1234567890): Array[AnyVal] // loss of precision
Array(b, 33, 'a')      : Array[Char]
Array(5.toByte, 11)    : Array[Byte]
In this article